Spending Clause
"The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States..."(Article I, Section 8, Clause 1).
We find that early on in the nation's history there were differing view points on the implications of the spending clause.
- Madison's view was that this limited Congress to only being able to spend if it furthered ends that were spelled out elsewhere in the Constitution; Jefferson agreed with this idea.
- Hamilton's view was that the clause imposed virtually no restrictions on what Congress could deem as the "general Welfare" of the country.
- A third view, later espoused by Monroe, was that spending by Congress is to be unrestricted as long as it is "general" and benefits the nation as a whole and not only a specific locale or region or group of people.
Early Congressional actions show that Hamilton's view was rejected. And administrations throughout most of the first half of the 19th century rejected the broad interpretation also. The limits on Congressional spending have been slowly eroding ever since, most notably with FDR. And that brings us to our current situation:
- National Debt - $10.9 Trillion
- Deficit for FY 2008 - $454.7 Billion
- Deficit for first 4 months FY 2008 - $88.9 Billion
- Deficit for first 4 months FY 2009 - $569 Billion
This is insanity, it clearly violates the principles of the Constitution, and it will bankrupt the next generation if we do not do something to get these irresponsible, arrogant ideologues out of power SOON!
$1 Billion = $1,000 Million = $1,000,000,000
$1 Trillion = $1,000,000 Million = $1,000,000,000,000
[The Heritage Guide to the Constitution Regnery Publishing, Inc. (2005) ppg. 93-96]
I totally agree!
ReplyDelete